Drug consumption sites’ crime and disorder effects: Canada’s experience

As Canada passes the five-year anniversary of its national experiment with widespread supervised drug consumption sites (SCS), many of its residents living or owning businesses near the sites are “feeling like they were ‘sold a bill of goods’" by advocates, government officials and professed experts who’d promised that having a local SCS “would not have any negative impact on the neighbourhood”.

Canada’s forty or so SCS sites have struggled to successfully handle the transition from old-school heroin to fentanyl and the rise of polysubstance use that adds meth, crack and illicit prescription pharmaceuticals to the mix and made drugs and addiction far more unmanageable and detrimental to the addicted and host communities alike. As the director of an Ottawa SCS recently explained, even in the handful of years since her site opened, the drug scene has shifted from non-fentanyl opioids that are typically injected two or three times a day, to the more intense but shorter-lived high offered by fentanyl, used eight to 12 times a day, with smoking increasingly preferred over injecting as the delivery means.

Over the past few years, multiple Canadian drug consumption sites have been shut down over intolerable crime and disorder impacts on nearby residents and businesses, or are being sued by neighbors or protested and sometimes blocked before they can open, while others soldier on despite formal governmental declarations they’re harming the community.